In the second half of his argument, Kennedy zeroes in on long-term risks and the controversial idea that EMR may have cancer-causing potential. Though mainstream science, including the FDA and cancer research organizations, maintains that there’s no strong evidence linking mobile phone use to brain cancer, Kennedy points to large-scale rat studies where high EMR exposure led to tumor growth.
Critics argue those conditions far exceed real-world exposure, but Kennedy leans into the ambiguity, suggesting today’s standards may be overlooking subtle, cumulative damage. He doesn’t call for banning phones, but demands stronger safety checks, transparency, and better testing of 5G’s effects—particularly its pulsed signal pattern. While the science remains inconclusive, Kennedy’s insistence forces the conversation out of the shadows and into the public eye, daring us to question whether the race for speed is leaving safety behind.